ToMotion AI logo
Menu
Back to gallery

Public AI explainer video

One Assessment, Two Frameworks?

Can one assessment satisfy both the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001? Think of a workplace project risk review: identify who could be harmed and how to...

Prompt

Source idea used to generate this video.

Explain the AI impact assessment as per EU AI act and ISO 42001.

Narration

Narration used to create this video.

Video narration

Can one assessment satisfy both the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001? Think of a workplace project risk review: identify who could be harmed and how to reduce that harm. But there's no universal checklist. The key distinction: the EU AI Act sets a specific legal trigger. Before use, certain deployers must conduct a fundamental rights impact assessment, or FRIA, for specified high-risk AI systems. This includes some public-service providers and certain credit or insurance uses; the exact duty depends on your role and the system's use. ISO/IEC 42001 takes a different route. It embeds impact assessment in an AI management system, considering consequences for individuals, groups and society. That is a management process, not an EU legal obligation. So, can one replace the other? No. Connect them: use the broader ISO process to manage impacts, and meet the EU Act's FRIA requirement when its legal trigger applies.