Video narration
If a child is safe at the neighborhood playground only by being kept out, is that really protection? Online, safety and access need not cancel each other. According to the supplied account of Just Rights for Children Alliance v. S. Harish & Others, the Supreme Court recognized internet access and use as a fundamental right for children of any age. That right rests on Article 21, protecting life and personal liberty, read with Article 19(1)(a), protecting free expression. It does not make every online activity unrestricted. Instead of shutting children out, the ruling calls for action against harmful content and those who create or spread it. Safeguards discussed include parental supervision, private accounts by default, limits on messages from unknown adults, and a special child mode for social media. It also directed stronger steps to detect and remove child sexual exploitation and abuse material online. So, does protecting children mean denying them internet access? No. The principle is protection, not exclusion.